The bill would have required the most advanced AI models to undergo safety testing.
It would have forced developers to ensure their technology included a so-called “kill switch”. A kill switch would allow organisations to isolate and effectively switch off AI systems if they were they became a threat.
It would also have made official oversight compulsory for the development of so-called “Frontier Models” – or the most powerful AI systems.
In his statement, Mr Newsom said the bill “does not take into account whether an Al system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data.”
“Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions – so long as a large system deploys it,” he added.
California is home to many of the world’s largest and most advanced AI companies, including the ChatGPT maker, OpenAI.
Mr Wiener said the decision to veto the bill leaves AI companies with “no binding restrictions from US policy makers, particularly given Congress’s continuing paralysis around regulating the tech industry in any meaningful way.”
Efforts by Congress to impose safeguards on AI have stalled.
OpenAI, Google and Meta were among several major tech firms that voiced opposition to the the bill and warned it would hinder the development of a crucial technology.
